A friend of ours showed us a 1945 movie from her collection called “The Harvey Girls.” It reminded me of the strategy some modern restaurant chains use to get customers. The difference is that then, the young ladies were far more “proper” and, with marriage as their only career path, may have done more to win the west than anything else.
As I watched one of the big dance numbers with many dozens of lovely young ladies. I wondered if they had known any Harvey Weinsteins (#MeToo) back then.
I knew the answer. Probably all of them.
The title of the movie took on a whole new, dark, theme.
As a student of behavior, I wondered if I could objectively estimate how many of those young women had successfully passed the casting couch exam.
- I knew that some would have the strength to say no.
- I knew that some would be lucky enough to skip the exam.
- And I knew that there may have been some honorable men in the industry hiring a young women based on talent and looks rather than other features.
How do we measure the number?
We look at all the films for that studio, for all the studios. We figure out how many of those young women made it from film to film. The more movies in which a young woman appears, the better the chance she’d seen at least one casting couch.
Now, here’s the hard part for those who idolize actors like Judy Garland and Angela Lansbury. These were young women who became legendary. But they started out exactly like the other young women.
What are the chances they also passed the couch test? What are the chances that their experiences led them to having a difficult life later? Consider what happened to Judy Garland. Perhaps the demons she was fighting weren’t all personal issues, but more like “personnel” issues.
Sometimes watching an old movie isn’t as much fun as it should be. That’s the downside of studying behavior, we have to take the light with the dark.
Thanks for reading.