Last P&P post covered the fact that the omniscient narrator was making a mistake. I know, it seems crazy, but there it is. She (of course it’s a she!) makes claims about Mr. Bennet that aren’t shown in the book.
What we didn’t cover was why the narrator would make mistakes like that. What is she hiding? More importantly, what is Jane Austen trying to prove?
I’m not sure what Jane was thinking, but it certainly makes the book far more complex. It means the narrator becomes a character. And a character has, well, a character.
In the case of P&P, this narrator is certainly not omniscient. Even worse, the narrator has a thing against Mrs. Bennet. How do I know? Check out this evidence.
Her father, captivated by youth and beauty, and that appearance of good humour which youth and beauty generally give, had married a woman whose weak understanding and illiberal mind had very early in their marriage put an end to all real affection for her. Respect, esteem, and confidence had vanished for ever; and all his views of domestic happiness were overthrown.
This comes from P&P, first paragraph of Chapter 42 (Volume 2 Chapter 19).
Talk about getting slammed! The narrator is pretty much saying Mrs. Bennet who is weak, illiberal, no longer gets any affection, respect, esteem, or confidence.
But the book doesn’t hold up any of those claims. True, Mr. Bennet never kisses her or says he loves her, but a lot of that didn’t go on back in those days anyway. At the same time, he does show her respect and confidence throughout. So what’s going on here?
The only thing I can figure is that the narrator has it in for Mrs. Bennet.
Maybe they were childhood rivals, and the narrator is in love with Mr. Bennet? Or perhaps it’s a sister that no one likes to talk about. At any rate, the narrator takes great pains throughout the story to slam Mrs. Bennet whenever she can. Why?
Even if you think this is crazy talk, consider this. No one writes tighter than Jane Austen. It’s like reading a compressed computer file that expands in your head. So why should Jane keep going on and on about how silly Mrs. Bennet is?
There can only be one reason. Mrs. Bennet is truly a genius but hides it well. The narrator is jealous, but since she’s a narrator she doesn’t have much recourse to revenge but telling us lies about Mrs. Bennet. That’s where the vengeance comes in.
What who did when, I don’t know. But I’ll get to the bottom of it. In the meantime, I’ll just have to read more Jane.