Brilliant Suffering

I finished Larry Brilliant’s autobiography today, and enjoyed it immensely.  If you read his book, you know what I mean and can skip the remainder of this paragraph.  If you haven’t read this, I recommend it highly.  His life truly begins as he joins the love of his life in pursuit of the meaning of life.  Germinating at the feet of Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, nourished by the Summer of Love and hardened by the abuses of that era, Larry becomes a radical doctor helping those no matter who they are.  His soul-mate decides their shared paths go through India, and to India they go in pursuit of enlightenment.  Guru Maharaji determines that Larry’s dharma lies in helping others, and that his karma yoga is through work.  The ultimate prize is eliminating killer smallpox, a disease that killed over half a billion people in the 20th century alone.  That’s more than all the wars and famines and tragedies all put together.  The adventures, the successes, and the failures are enjoyable told and hold many lessons.

Larry asks the ultimate question that every compassionate soul has asked through the ages: Why does suffering exist?  He typically pondered this while holding the body of a dead child.  I am going to answer this question in terms that rely on what we know of biology and ecosystems and philosophy.  I’m going to keep it as short as possible, so that much detail may be lacking.  And I’m going to answer it in such a way so that it addresses a related question: What is the best way to relieve suffering in the world in the long term?  Most recently, Jeff Bezos has asked this question, inviting his twitter followers to submit their suggestions as to how he focuses his charity.

However, neither Larry Brilliant or Jeff Bezos, or even most people are going to like the answer here.  For the truth is raw and uncompromising, much as Mother Nature shows Herself to be when in her full glory.  We tend to forget that to Mother Nature, all forms of life and death and joy and suffering, are all aspects of a single existence.

Moreover, when you look closely at the holiest of all holy texts in every religion, you see that they agree on that fundamental truth.  Life and death, joy and suffering, are all part of the same thing.  You can’t have one without the other.  A Tibetan monk explains to Larry, when he asks the question yet again, that suffering will always be part of the human condition as long as ignorance and obsession exist.  In the same scene, Larry is blessed for the simple fact that he is fighting a great scourge of humanity, and to alleviate any suffering is an act to strive for.

This is not an argument against charity, but an answer to the question “How can I be most charitable?”  At the same time, I hope to explain why suffering exists in any form, and why our best charitable efforts may in fact not appear to be charity.

Suffering may come from many sources, from outside ourselves, but also within.  We generally agree that some suffering is good for the soul, for it makes us tougher, makes us more willing to take risks.  But when is suffering too much?  Who is to decide?

Nature decides, using the most fundamental rules possible: life and death.  When she unleashed smallpox upon humanity, a third of its victims would die a gruesome and painful death.  Another third would be permanently handicapped.  The remaining third?  Survivors.

Now that we have eliminated smallpox, we will not know what made those survivors different from the rest.  What kind of world would this be if smallpox still existed?  Would it be a better world?  We simply don’t know.

And that’s the point.  For those of you who are spiritual and wish to second guess God, you can feel angry about the death of an innocent baby to such a gruesome disease.  But if God is playing the game for all of humanity, and not only that one baby or her family, then who are we to be critical?

Suffering exists, and we must learn from it.  As long as ignorance exists there will be suffering.  Such is the wheel of life.  No matter what your religion or how you talk to your God, fundamentally they all say the same thing.  Sub ek, all one.

Which brings us to the final point, how then do we best spend our precious charitable resources?  If you are moved to help someone read a book, buy groceries, or weed their garden, then you should.  However, if you have access to billions more resources, then consider this.  You should be pushing mankind further, higher, faster.  For Jeff Bezos, every last bit of his energy should be directed to making his dream of colonizing space a reality.  Spending even a few moments on any other endeavor may make him more popular, but only increases the risk of getting humanity off the ground.

Improving humanity means greater knowledge, and that automatically means less suffering.  It’s not the same thing as putting silver into a beggar’s hand, but it is far more lasting.

Namaskar

 

May all beings have happiness and the cause of happiness.
May they be free of suffering and the cause of suffering.
May they never be disassociated from the supreme happiness which is without suffering.
May they remain in the boundless equanimity, free from both attachment to close ones and rejection of others.

 

Roddenberry’s Warning

Hello friend,

It’s been a long time since I’ve visited any of you, and for that I’m sorry.  I’ve been busy adjusting to a new life of semi-retirement, as well as writing a new book.  This one will be an easy read, a romantic comedy.  Stay tuned!

In the meantime, the wife and I enjoyed watching 3 versions of Roddenberry’s original Star Trek pilot called “The Cage.”  One of the 3 was a two part episode called “The Menagerie,” but is essentially the same program.  We enjoyed watching the three versions in order to see how the concepts were evolving at that early stage, as well as how Roddenberry was working within the constraints of TV.

For me, however, the most interesting part occurred around the 32 minute mark into the “restored” version.  Yes, I’d seen it before, long ago, but had not the maturity at the time, nor had the experience of almost 3 decades of internet usage under my belt.

Here’s the text of that critical minute:

VINA: Perhaps if you asked me some questions, I could answer.
PIKE: How far can they control my mind?
VINA: If I tell you, then will you pick some dream you’ve had and let me live it with you?
PIKE: Perhaps.
VINA: They can’t actually make you do anything you don’t want to do.
PIKE: But they try to trick me with their illusions.
VINA: And, they can punish you when you’re not co-operative. You’ll find out about that.
PIKE: Did they ever live on the surface of this planet? Why did they go underground?
VINA: War, thousands of centuries ago.
PIKE: That’s why it’s so barren up there?
VINA; The planet’s only now becoming able to support life again.
PIKE: So the Talosians who came underground found life limited here and they concentrated on developing their mental power.
VINA: But they found it’s a trap. Like a narcotic. Because when dreams become more important than reality, you give up travel, building, creating. You even forget how to repair the machines left behind by your ancestors. You just sit, living and reliving other lives left behind in the thought record.
PIKE: Or sit probing minds of zoo specimens like me.
VINA: You’re better than a theatre to them. They create the illusion for you, they watch you react, feel your emotions. They have a whole collection of specimens, descendants of life brought back long ago from all over this part of the galaxy.
PIKE: Which means they had to have more than one of each animal.
VINA: Please.

(both the bold print and underline are mine)

The moment I heard that line, I realized that it was the seed Roddenberry used to create the entire episode.  It’s the moral nugget he would place in each episode of Star Trek, and it’s why the original series carries a moral weight, above and beyond any of the subsequent spin-offs.

… when dreams become more important than reality …

That’s the problem we face today, in a form that Roddenberry could not imagine.  Bradbury did, with his floor-to-ceiling interactive TVs and book burning firemen.  But today’s technology is taking us even beyond what they could have imagined.

For few young people of today can take apart and rebuild a toaster oven (easy) let alone a computer or cell phone (hard).  More conversations have to do with Hollywood and first-person shooters than with history or current politics.

And the dreams we had as a society, of building a civilization among the stars?  Those can be realized instantly with fantasy books and video games.  Why bother actually working towards building the first true space station, or lunar base, or martian colony?

If you’re a trekkie, check out the original version at the 32 minute mark.  Vina (played perfectly by Susan Oliver) explains this to Pike (played perfectly by Jeffrey Hunter) at the 32:40 mark.  Then think about it, and then turn off all your electronics.  Do something real that gets us closer to your dream, your real dream.  Because when you realize your dreams in reality, you leave something behind that your children will enjoy.

Above all, please remember the children.

http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/1.htm

http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Cage_(episode)