She made a point about being a virgin, and how that was a gift she intended for her future husband. It’s a wonderful sentiment, its value is certainly recognized by society, and almost every culture and religion reinforces the idea.
But it’s misplaced.
To understand why, let’s go back a few years. Back when the term was first used, almost a thousand years ago.
Society was climbing out of the dark ages, and needed more ways to help categorize people as life became a bit more complex. Every time a holy book needed to be translated, it didn’t hurt to update the fundamental concepts with new terms. That’s why, for followers of Christianity, Mary the Mom of Jesus eventually became Virgin Mary.
Over time we started valuing the concept of “virgin” itself instead of the more fundamental concept those translators were trying to describe.
What was that fundamental concept? It’s the same thing our courageous young lady wants to give to her husband.
It’s the gift of commitment.
It’s a way of telling someone that you are willing to stick by their side, for better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish, till death do you part.
Our young warrior (for that is what she is) worries that she will be inexperienced, or incapable of adequately pleasing her husband in that way. Nonsense. This is what she’ll need to keep him happy, and it’s what he will need as well.
That’s the value of “virginity” and it has nothing to do with sex.
As for the greater questions she raises about pornography and how it hurts young men and society, I may have covered that already. If not, let me know.