Cosmos 2.0 has begun, and like the Olympiad, it heralds a new dawn of entertainment. Whether it also ushers in understanding is another question. On this day that we celebrate and respect religious worship, does it seem odd that Neal deGrasse Tyson should appear just before the altar?
Now that 34 years have passed, Dr. Tyson is taking up the mantle of Carl Sagan and teaching us about the wonders of the cosmos. In so doing, he’s touching upon some significant events in our intellectual history.
A tragic character chosen in Episode One is a priest named Giordano Bruno. Now poor Mr. Bruno didn’t do well as a priest, ostensibly because he had a great revelation about the infinite cosmos. He tried to tell others, but the Catholic church took offense. Somewhat unwisely he returned to Rome where the church gave him a warm welcome – and goodbye. They burned him at the stake.
It’s not quite true, unfortunately. The stake part is, but let’s say that the show took poetic license in telling the story. You can read the details here.
The details aren’t quite important for today’s post, because my question is this; why do you think the Church felt threatened by Bruno’s crazy ideas? That they were crazy is beyond doubt, because any idea that isn’t shared by more than “a lot” of people has to be crazy. That’s the whole definition of crazy. The fact that he would eventually be proven right, centuries later, isn’t important.
There’s a good chance that you, too, have a deeply held model of the universe. It might have a god, or a GOD, or a whole pantheon of gods. For all I know it may center around a black hole. However, I ask you, why is it that (for most people!) it’s such a sensitive topic? If someone comes along and says “Your view is wrong!” what does it matter? Why do you care?
Why DO you care?