Our art museum is putting on this excellent display of pre-romantic paintings that were used to record historical events. Journalism in painting.
Painting is a story told visually, and because the artist is mostly in control, a lot of what they are thinking can come through.
When it’s historical in nature, we also get a glimpse into the big behavioral picture.
There’s this one painting showing a citadel in the background, and a riot going on in front of the locked gates. (I can’t find it! When I do, I’ll include a link here.)
The caption beside the painting notes that during the years of 1634-35 there was a great famine, and the ruler allowed bread to be sold outside the citadel gates at fixed prices. The hungry population was so angry that a riot ensued. Because of the famine, almost 5% of the population perished. That’s one person out of every twenty.
That was enough to cause the ruler to change the laws regarding land ownership, basically giving more power to the people.
Here’s what we can learn.
It took a great toll among the people before the ruling class decided they needed to shift the distribution of wealth. Lots of people had to die miserable deaths before those in power would change the system.
Today, we also have increasing wealth inequalities. How far will the current levels of pain go before our governments address the pain of the people? History, at least this little oil-painted piece, suggests that about 5% of the population will have to perish first.
Is this the best way to figure this out? Absolutely not. But it’s a start.
And as far as wealth distribution is concerned, isn’t it better we start now?
Aren’t art museums fun?
Thanks for reading.